Gary Marcus

The statement '@HulsmanZacchary Agree it’s mostly common knowledge now. What’s shocking is how much grief I got for saying it then.' is a response in a conversation about a paper on symbolic learning in deep learning models. The statement reflects a personal experience related to the reception of ideas previously shared by the speaker, indicating a reflection on the social dynamics of academic or intellectual discussions. This can be considered public discourse as it engages with the broader issue of how new or critical ideas are received in academic or intellectual communities.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not appear to cause harm but rather shares a personal experience of receiving 'grief' for an opinion, which could imply emotional distress caused by others, not by the speaker. [+1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects privacy and dignity, not revealing any specific individuals or engaging in harmful speech. [+1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   While not directly promoting understanding, empathy, or compassion, the statement does open a window into the personal impact of academic discourse, which could foster a broader understanding of the emotional dimensions of intellectual disagreements.
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement avoids personal attacks and focuses on the speaker's own experience, maintaining a neutral tone without engaging in ad hominem arguments. [+1]