Gary Marcus

Rank 31 of 47
|
Score 0
4/25/2024, 2:06:10 PM
X
In reply to:
……………………,,,
@vocdetox
·
320d
@GaryMarcus Invented drama
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
320d
Insane that anyone putatively on the left would attack someone for being in an interracial marriage.

But here we are, as lunatic fringe of the left makes common cause with the lunatic fringe of the right.

Social media and the quest for likes, combined with algorithms that…
Brianna Wu
@BriannaWu
·
320d
If I seem less charitable to Free Palestine today than three months ago, the countless death threats, rape threats, smear campaigns, outright lies, and even attacks by figures like Hasan on my interracial marriage are part of that growing anger.

I think some of you care about…

The statement '@vocdetox Did you watch the Hasan clip? The dude spouts this shit and has a million followers.' is a response in a thread discussing the behavior and impact of public figures on social media, specifically addressing the content shared by a person named Hasan. The statement criticizes Hasan for the nature of his content and highlights his large following as a point of concern.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but uses derogatory language ('spouts this shit') which could be seen as harmful or disrespectful. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy in that it does not disclose sensitive personal information, but it lacks respect in its tone and choice of words. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is dismissive and critical without providing constructive context or engagement. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism but does not foster constructive dialogue or offer a reasoned critique of the content or its implications. [-1]
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    There is no indication of acknowledgment or correction of mistakes; the statement is more accusatory than reflective.
  6. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The use of dismissive language does not contribute positively to societal betterment or encourage a responsible discourse. [-1]
  7. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement uses the platform to express a critical viewpoint but does not uphold principles of responsible and integrity-driven speech. [-1]