Gary Marcus

Rank 31 of 47
|
Score 0
4/25/2024, 2:07:52 PM
X
In reply to:
……………………,,,
@vocdetox
·
321d
@GaryMarcus Invented drama
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
321d
Insane that anyone putatively on the left would attack someone for being in an interracial marriage.

But here we are, as lunatic fringe of the left makes common cause with the lunatic fringe of the right.

Social media and the quest for likes, combined with algorithms that…
Brianna Wu
@BriannaWu
·
321d
If I seem less charitable to Free Palestine today than three months ago, the countless death threats, rape threats, smear campaigns, outright lies, and even attacks by figures like Hasan on my interracial marriage are part of that growing anger.

I think some of you care about…

The statement in question engages in public discourse by addressing the perceived discrepancy between public opinion polls and actual societal attitudes towards racial issues. The user expresses skepticism about the optimism shown in a graph depicting increasing approval rates for interracial marriages, suggesting that racial tensions have escalated, contrary to what the graph indicates. This statement contributes to a broader discussion about the reliability of polls and the real state of racial relations.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to highlight a serious concern about racial tensions, which is a significant societal issue. It does not appear to cause harm but rather invites further scrutiny and discussion. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The user respects the dignity of others by not making any derogatory comments or engaging in hate speech. The focus is on the issue rather than on individuals. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The comment promotes understanding by pointing out a potential disconnect between statistical data and public perception, which could lead to a deeper investigation and discussion. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The user engages in constructive criticism of the data presented, which could encourage more comprehensive analyses and discussions about the topic. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    By questioning the data and encouraging a reevaluation of perceived societal progress, the user uses their platform to potentially enlighten others about the complexities of interpreting social data and the real state of societal issues. [+1]