Gary Marcus

Rank 37 of 47
|
Score -59
4/25/2024, 5:48:47 PM
X
In reply to:
NB
@Nechku
·
323d
@GaryMarcus He has thousands of hours of his documented opinion on interracial marriage.

You saw a single clip.

I mean, just don't make up your opinion from a single clip online, because for that metric there are many clips of her that are worse.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
323d
@Nechku you are, or you didn’t see Hasan’s video. It’s publicly available, and despicable. I watched and could not believe the guy said what he said.
NB
@Nechku
·
323d
@GaryMarcus Tbf, she is lying.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
323d
Insane that anyone putatively on the left would attack someone for being in an interracial marriage.

But here we are, as lunatic fringe of the left makes common cause with the lunatic fringe of the right.

Social media and the quest for likes, combined with algorithms that…
Brianna Wu
@BriannaWu
·
323d
If I seem less charitable to Free Palestine today than three months ago, the countless death threats, rape threats, smear campaigns, outright lies, and even attacks by figures like Hasan on my interracial marriage are part of that growing anger.

I think some of you care about…

The statement in question is part of a larger conversation on social media about racism, interracial marriage, and public figures' opinions. The tone is confrontational and accusatory, and the content directly addresses the behavior and public statements of an individual, which are tied to broader societal issues such as racism and public accountability.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does harm by using harsh language and potentially escalating the conflict. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the dignity of others to a degree by condemning racist behavior, but it does so in a manner that could be seen as aggressive and not conducive to respectful discourse.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement lacks empathy and compassion in its confrontational tone and choice of words, which may hinder rather than promote understanding. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism but does so in a manner that could be perceived as a personal attack rather than constructive dialogue. [-1]