In reply to:
thoughtcrime
@thoughtcrime___
·
426d
Bojan Tunguz
@tunguz
·
426d
The statement '@thoughtcrime___ @tunguz I am not a doomer and you should read what I have actually written.' is a response in a thread discussing the reliability and potential consequences of using large language models (LLMs). The statement is part of a broader conversation about the implications of technology, which is a public issue. Therefore, it constitutes public discourse.
- The statement aims to clarify the speaker's position without causing harm or using harmful language. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, avoiding any form of harassment or derogatory comments. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- While the statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, it does encourage reading and understanding different viewpoints, which indirectly supports this principle.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in a form of constructive criticism by urging others to read the speaker's actual writings, rather than resorting to personal attacks or misrepresentations. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.