In reply to:
Bojan Tunguz
@tunguz
·
425d
The statement by @GaryMarcus and the subsequent replies engage in a discussion about the reliability and functionality of large language models (LLMs), which is a topic of public interest particularly in the field of artificial intelligence and technology. This discussion contributes to the broader dialogue about the development and implications of AI technologies, thus constituting public discourse.
- The statement aims to highlight issues with current AI technologies without causing harm or promoting negativity. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing solely on the technology. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement indirectly promotes understanding by sharing personal experiences with AI, which could help others relate or understand the technology's current state. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of AI technologies, though it could be seen as slightly dismissive, it does not resort to personal attacks.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By sharing insights on AI, the statement uses influence to inform and potentially drive improvements in technology. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement uses the platform responsibly to discuss relevant and significant issues in technology. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.