Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 64
5/6/2024, 2:25:23 PM
X
In reply to:
Peter Voss
@peterevoss
·
424d
@GaryMarcus "Lenat published in 1984 an analysis of what were the limitations of his AM and Eurisko lines of research.[19] It concluded that progress toward real, general, symbolic AI would require a vast knowledge base of "common sense" -- this?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
424d
@peterevoss Doug Lenat often used that term or similar.
Peter Voss
@peterevoss
·
424d
@GaryMarcus I see my 'Real AGI' mem is catching on!

https://petervoss.substack.com/p…
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
424d
Real AGI shouldn’t require massive hardware breakthroughs or enough energy to power small cities.

It’s a sign that we aren’t doing things right if our systems are vastly less efficient than human brains, in terms of both data and energy.

The statement is part of a conversation on Twitter discussing the limitations and requirements of achieving real, general, symbolic Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). The discourse involves the historical context of AI research and the concept of 'common sense' in AI development, which are substantive topics relevant to public issues in technology and AI ethics. Therefore, this statement constitutes public discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and is focused on a technical discussion, thus adhering to the principle of doing no harm with words. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, avoiding any personal attacks or sensitive personal information. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement contributes to a better understanding of AI development challenges, promoting a form of intellectual empathy and comprehension among readers. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The dialogue is constructive, focusing on the exchange of ideas rather than personal attacks, which aligns with engaging in constructive criticism and dialogue. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to educate and inform about AI, contributing positively to societal understanding of AI challenges. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement uses the platform responsibly, contributing to the free exchange of ideas and information on AI development. [+1]