Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 64
5/6/2024, 2:25:53 PM
X
In reply to:
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
424d
@peterevoss Doug Lenat often used that term or similar.
Peter Voss
@peterevoss
·
424d
@GaryMarcus I see my 'Real AGI' mem is catching on!

https://petervoss.substack.com/p…
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
424d
Real AGI shouldn’t require massive hardware breakthroughs or enough energy to power small cities.

It’s a sign that we aren’t doing things right if our systems are vastly less efficient than human brains, in terms of both data and energy.

The statement '@peterevoss Might have been Real AI' is a brief comment in a conversation about artificial general intelligence (AGI). The discussion appears to be about the nature and definition of 'Real AGI,' contrasting current approaches with the original vision of AI. This conversation, while technical and specific to the field of AI, does engage in public discourse as it addresses issues related to technology development, efficiency, and the philosophical underpinnings of artificial intelligence, which are of public concern.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm as it is a neutral comment on the possibility of an AI system being 'Real AI.' [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy and dignity, avoiding any personal attacks or sensitive information. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement indirectly promotes understanding by contributing to a discussion on what constitutes 'Real AGI,' though it is not explicitly empathetic or compassionate.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in a form of constructive dialogue by acknowledging a term used in the discussion, though it does not directly address disagreement.
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to engage in a technical discussion, which could indirectly benefit society by clarifying concepts in AI.
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech by contributing responsibly to a public technical discussion without misinformation or harmful content. [+1]