Gary Marcus

The statement by @mllichti engages in a technical discussion about the progress and expectations of AI model developments, specifically comparing GPT-3.5 and GPT-4. It critiques the predictive accuracy of scaling laws in AI advancements, suggesting a discrepancy between theoretical predictions and observed advancements.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does no harm as it is a factual critique based on mathematical expectations versus observed results. [+1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   It respects the dignity of others by focusing on the subject matter without derogatory comments or personal attacks. [+1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The comment promotes understanding by highlighting a potential issue in the predictive models used in AI development. [+1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   It engages in constructive criticism by pointing out discrepancies in scaling laws predictions, inviting further scrutiny and discussion. [+1]
5. Principle 5:

   I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.

   The statement acknowledges a gap in expectations, which could be seen as an indirect admission that previous models or predictions might need reevaluation. [+1]
6. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   By critiquing the scaling laws, the statement uses its influence to prompt a reevaluation of how AI advancements are measured and predicted, potentially benefiting the field. [+1]
7. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds the principles of free speech responsibly by contributing substantively to the discussion on AI development without misinformation. [+1]