Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83

The statement in question is a part of a public discourse on the topic of AI development and scaling laws. The user expresses a strong disagreement with Eric Schmidt's view that AI is under-hyped and that scaling laws are continuing effectively. The statement is based on empirical data and discusses the perceived stagnation in major advances despite significant investments.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to do no harm and focuses on providing a counterpoint based on data, thus adhering to the principle of doing no harm with words. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The user respects the dignity of others by focusing on the argument and data rather than personal attacks, upholding the principle of respecting the privacy and dignity of others. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by bringing empirical data into the conversation, which helps in fostering a more informed discussion. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The user engages in constructive criticism by presenting an opposing viewpoint based on data, contributing positively to the dialogue. [+1]
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    There is an implicit acknowledgment that the user's view could be subject to change if new data or advances occur, aligning with the principle of acknowledging and correcting mistakes. [+1]
  6. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    By contributing a data-driven perspective to the public discourse on AI, the user uses their influence to better inform the public. [+1]
  7. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech by using the platform to express a dissenting view responsibly. [+1]