The statement praises DeepMind for adhering to their commitments regarding AI safety, contrasting them with other AI labs that have reportedly failed to do so. The mention of 'Moloch' metaphorically criticizes these other organizations for sacrificing ethical considerations for other gains.
- The statement does no harm as it focuses on praising ethical behavior in AI development. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects the dignity of others by positively highlighting DeepMind's actions, though it could be seen as slightly disrespectful to other organizations by not providing a detailed context for their actions.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by acknowledging the importance of AI safety commitments. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in constructive criticism by implicitly calling for other AI labs to follow DeepMind's example. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not acknowledge the complexities mentioned by Jack Clark in the image, which could be seen as an oversight. [-1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- It uses influence to advocate for ethical behavior in AI development, aligning with societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by expressing an opinion on a public issue responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.