Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83
5/8/2024, 1:54:04 AM
X
In reply to:
Michael Gruen
@Michaelgr1011
·
599d
@GaryMarcus @ericschmidt that sounded like u are mad at me, i was just asking haha did not mean to come off as rude if that is how i came off
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
599d
@Michaelgr1011 @ericschmidt Eric almost certainly wrong. try actually fitting the curve, after reading this:

https://garymarcus.substack.com/…
Michael Gruen
@Michaelgr1011
·
599d
@GaryMarcus @ericschmidt minus a few minor valleys i think eric is right no? also of the users, has time used gone up?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
599d
I could not disagree with you more strongly here, @ericschmidt.

Scaling has at least temporarily slowed.

The empirical data are clear: despite massive investments of time, labor and money, there has been no major advance in 14 months. The growth we see from GPT-2 to GPT-4 has…
Tsarathustra
@tsarnick
·
599d
Eric Schmidt says AI is under-hyped because the scaling laws are continuing without any loss of power

The statement '@Michaelgr1011 @ericschmidt nope just showing you the data' is a part of a larger conversation about the development and scaling of large language models (LLMs). The statement itself is a response to a perceived misunderstanding or accusation of emotional reaction in the discussion. It aims to clarify that the intent was merely to present data relevant to the discussion, not to provoke or escalate any emotional response.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm as it seeks to clarify the intent of the data sharing, contributing positively to the discussion. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It respects the dignity of others by maintaining a neutral tone and focusing on the data rather than personal attributes or intentions. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by redirecting the focus to the data, which is central to the discussion on LLMs. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    It engages in constructive dialogue by clarifying the purpose of the data sharing, thus fostering a more informed discussion. [+1]
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The statement corrects a potential misunderstanding about the intent behind sharing the data, aligning with the principle of acknowledging and correcting mistakes. [+1]
  6. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    By focusing on data, the statement uses its influence to contribute to a factual and rational debate on the topic of LLM development. [+1]
  7. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech responsibly by contributing substantively to the discussion without causing harm or spreading misinformation. [+1]