Gary Marcus

The statement engages in a discussion about accountability in the tech industry and broader societal implications, which constitutes public discourse. The tone is somewhat skeptical and critical, particularly towards the effectiveness of accountability measures. The intent appears to be to question the completeness and fairness of holding influential figures accountable, suggesting that not all responsible parties may have been pursued.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not seem to intend harm but rather to critique the accountability process, aligning moderately with the principle of doing no harm with words. [+1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects privacy and dignity, avoiding any personal attacks or sensitive personal information, thus aligning well with this principle. [+2]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   While the statement raises a valid point about accountability, it lacks a constructive approach to promoting understanding or empathy, showing a neutral alignment with this principle.
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in a critical dialogue without resorting to personal attacks, focusing on the issue of accountability, which aligns well with engaging constructively with those in disagreement. [+2]
5. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses its influence to question and potentially improve societal mechanisms (like accountability in tech), aiming for societal betterment, thus aligning with this principle. [+1]