In reply to:
marian bantjes
@bantjes
·
600d
The statement is part of a public discourse on the sustainability and impact of technological products from major companies, including a discussion on the future of OpenAI's GPT-5. The tone is informative and somewhat corrective, aiming to clarify misconceptions about business success and product failures.
- The statement does no harm with words and actions, focusing on factual business observations. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- Respects the privacy and dignity of others, with no personal attacks or sensitive information disclosed. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- Promotes understanding by providing examples of past tech products that did not succeed yet did not doom their companies. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- Engages in constructive criticism by correcting a perceived misreading of earlier comments, without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- Uses influence to provide a broader perspective on business and technology, contributing positively to societal understanding of tech industry dynamics. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- Uses the platform responsibly, sharing insights based on historical tech product performances to inform and educate. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.