Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47

Score 83

@jason_pontin Eh, I write articles all the time, and just finished a book? As to the last, If VCs like you would put real $ into something other than a fad (few seem willing to leave the beaten path) I might build indeed something but given the price of talent it would take significantly more…

5/9/2024, 9:56:19 AM

In reply to:

Jason Pontin

@jason_pontin

600d

@GaryMarcus Why are you spending all your time on Twitter arguing these ideas? Write an article, book, speech; refute the opposing position with a better symbolic logic model.

Gary Marcus

@GaryMarcus

600d

Five predictions about OpenAI 2024-2025--from the person who told you first (even before it was released) that GPT-4 would continue to be unreliable and to hallucinate, that it would not have the imagined gigantic economic impact, and that pure LLMs would reach a point of…

The statement is part of a Twitter conversation involving public figures discussing the investment in technology and the challenges of innovation. The content addresses the issue of venture capital investment preferences and the economic realities of developing new technologies. This conversation touches upon societal issues related to economic development, technology, and innovation, making it a part of public discourse.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement does not appear to intend harm but expresses frustration about the economic barriers to innovation. [+1]
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing on the issue rather than personal attributes. [+1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
While the statement is somewhat critical, it lacks a strong emphasis on promoting understanding or compassion regarding differing viewpoints on investment strategies.
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in a form of constructive criticism about investment trends, though it could be perceived as slightly confrontational. It does not resort to personal attacks. [+1]
Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
The statement implicitly suggests a desire to use influence to encourage more meaningful investments in technology, which could be seen as aiming for the betterment of society. [+1]