Gary Marcus

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the accountability of tech executives, specifically referencing the case of Elizabeth Holmes. This topic is relevant to societal issues concerning corporate governance and the ethical responsibilities of leaders in the technology sector.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not appear to cause harm but rather contributes to a discussion on accountability. [+1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing on a public figure's professional actions without personal attacks. [+1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   While the statement does not explicitly promote empathy, it does contribute to a broader understanding of accountability in tech leadership.
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in constructive criticism about the broader issue of accountability without personal attacks. [+1]
5. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses its influence to discuss important aspects of societal betterment through accountability. [+1]
6. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement responsibly uses the platform to engage in a meaningful discussion about public accountability. [+1]