PeterCassizzi@toad.social
@Cassizzi
·
597d
The statement in question is part of a broader conversation about the current capabilities and limitations of generative AI technologies. It suggests renaming 'Generative AI' to 'Rough Draft AI' to better reflect its current utility and limitations, emphasizing that it is useful for initial drafts but should not be relied upon for final outputs. This conversation touches upon the accuracy, reliability, and future expectations of AI technologies, contributing to public discourse on technological development and its implications.
- The statement does no harm as it constructively critiques AI technology, aiming to set realistic expectations. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects the dignity of others by fostering a more accurate understanding of AI capabilities, potentially preventing misuse. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The suggestion promotes understanding by clarifying the current state of AI technology. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in constructive criticism by proposing a terminology change that could lead to clearer communication about AI capabilities. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence responsibly by contributing to a more informed public dialogue about AI. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- It upholds the principles of free speech by sharing an opinion that could provoke further discussion and reflection on AI technology. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.