Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 83
5/14/2024, 12:01:09 PM
X
In reply to:
Carlos Santana
@DotCSV
·
607d
@GaryMarcus A few days before...

"AutoGPT will manipulate market [...] -> nuclear war"
Carlos Santana
@DotCSV
·
607d
@GaryMarcus Usually, your opinions shift from 'AI capabilities are so overhyped, the bubble will pop soon' to 'Let me overhype this tech in the hands of bad actors'.

An example: AutoGPT

"I remember when AutoGPT was still hyped last week"
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
607d
@DotCSV If the translation is correct, this is a serious misrepresentation both of my actual claims, and of the pause letter.
Carlos Santana
@DotCSV
·
607d
Y el problema de Marcus en concreto es que el mismo que hace uno meses firmaba lo de "hay que parar la IA porque es muy peligrosa", es el mismo que jalea a las empresas para que publiquen más rápido, y si no es que "hemos chocado con un muro". 🤡
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
607d
Top 5 Reasons Why GPT-5 hasn’t come out yet.

5. Data center larger than the universe not yet fully constructed.
4. Still putting on the finishing touches, should be out next week/month/end of summer/by Fall.
3. They already have it, but are just toying with us.
2. They already…
Carlos Santana
@DotCSV
·
607d
Esto es como si de un año para otro Apple te pasa de un iPhone 5 a un iPhone 9, con más capacidades, potencia, velocidad, menos gastos de batería y a la 5ª parte de su precio... y alguien viene a quejarse de que "bueno, aún la pantalla sigue teniendo cuatro esquinas".
Carlos Santana
@DotCSV
·
607d
Esto además bajando el precio a una quinta parte desde Marzo 23 y haciendo el modelo el doble de rápido que la versión más rápida que teníamos (Turbo).

Humo le llaman... 🙄

The statement in question is part of a public discourse on the potential risks and scenarios involving AI technologies, specifically discussing the hypothetical use of AutoGPT in causing global conflicts. The tone of the conversation is serious and engages with a significant public concern about the misuse of AI technology.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm as it responsibly discusses potential risks without spreading misinformation or causing panic. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It respects the dignity of others by maintaining a focus on the topic without personal attacks or derogatory language. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by asking for evidence or strong arguments against the proposed scenario, encouraging a fact-based discussion. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    It engages in constructive criticism by questioning the plausibility of a scenario and inviting others to provide evidence or counterarguments. [+1]
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The statement acknowledges the possibility of the scenario while remaining open to corrections or opposing views, showing a willingness to correct misunderstandings. [+1]
  6. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    By discussing potential dangers of AI, the statement uses its influence to raise awareness about important issues, contributing positively to societal welfare. [+1]
  7. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech by using the platform to engage in a responsible discussion about public safety and technology. [+1]