Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 83
5/14/2024, 12:03:04 PM
X
In reply to:
Frank Rundatz
@FrankRundatz
·
608d
@northead @GaryMarcus Posting a tongue-in-cheek list amounts to a senseless crusade?

It looks to some that OpenAI is on a crusade to make fantastical claims about their proximity to AGI all while they’re violating copyrights en masse.

There’s nothing wrong with pointing any of this out.
Edoardo Maggio
@northead
·
608d
@GaryMarcus Instead of this seemingly senseless crusade, why not just think that... it's not ready yet? And considering that they are still leading and squeezing more value out of GPT-4's architecture, there's no need to rush out whatever they have (read: a non-polished model) just yet?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
608d
Top 5 Reasons Why GPT-5 hasn’t come out yet.

5. Data center larger than the universe not yet fully constructed.
4. Still putting on the finishing touches, should be out next week/month/end of summer/by Fall.
3. They already have it, but are just toying with us.
2. They already…

The statement in question is part of a Twitter conversation chain that discusses the development and release strategies of AI technologies, specifically referencing OpenAI and its products. The tone of the conversation is somewhat critical and sarcastic, particularly concerning the claims about AI advancements and copyright issues. The statement '@FrankRundatz @northead The scary part is that someone actually proposed #1…' is a response to a satirical list of reasons why a new AI model hasn't been released yet. This statement, while brief, engages in a discussion about the transparency and marketing strategies of AI companies, which is a relevant public issue.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm but lacks a constructive approach.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy and does not engage in harassment or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not significantly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement avoids personal attacks but does not engage deeply in constructive criticism or dialogue.
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement indirectly critiques potential misinformation or overhyped claims, which could be seen as using influence for societal betterment. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement contributes to a discussion on responsible AI development and use of platforms, aligning with responsible free speech. [+1]