Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 83
5/14/2024, 12:06:45 PM
X
In reply to:
Carlos Santana
@DotCSV
·
608d
@GaryMarcus "We’ll see what actually happens over the next 12 months"

A year has already passed. Can you provide evidence that supports your fears about systems like AutoGPT? 🤔
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
1004d
@pmddomingos the vectors seem obvious: autoGPT etc to issue lots of attacks, and the kind of deception plus gullibility that allowed GPT to trick someone into doing CaptCHAs.

not going to say more than that; we’ll what actually happens over next 12 months.
Carlos Santana
@DotCSV
·
608d
@GaryMarcus as also presented in the congress.
Carlos Santana
@DotCSV
·
608d
@GaryMarcus A few days before...

"AutoGPT will manipulate market [...] -> nuclear war"
Carlos Santana
@DotCSV
·
608d
@GaryMarcus Usually, your opinions shift from 'AI capabilities are so overhyped, the bubble will pop soon' to 'Let me overhype this tech in the hands of bad actors'.

An example: AutoGPT

"I remember when AutoGPT was still hyped last week"
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
608d
@DotCSV If the translation is correct, this is a serious misrepresentation both of my actual claims, and of the pause letter.
Carlos Santana
@DotCSV
·
608d
Y el problema de Marcus en concreto es que el mismo que hace uno meses firmaba lo de "hay que parar la IA porque es muy peligrosa", es el mismo que jalea a las empresas para que publiquen más rápido, y si no es que "hemos chocado con un muro". 🤡

The statement in question is part of a broader conversation about the potential risks and vulnerabilities associated with AI technologies like AutoGPT. The user references a specific article to support their claim about the technology's shortcomings and potential dangers. This contributes to a public discourse on AI safety and regulation, which is a significant societal issue.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to highlight concerns about AI vulnerabilities without causing harm, focusing on constructive criticism of the technology. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The user respects the dignity of others by focusing on the technology rather than personal attacks against individuals involved in its development or promotion. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by linking to an article that provides evidence of the discussed vulnerabilities, thereby educating the audience. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The user engages in constructive criticism by pointing out specific issues with the technology, which could lead to dialogue on how to address these vulnerabilities. [+1]
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The user acknowledges the shift in public interest regarding AutoGPT, which shows a willingness to correct or update the narrative based on new information or developments. [+1]
  6. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    By discussing the potential dangers of AI, the user uses their platform to advocate for caution and regulation, which could benefit society by preventing misuse or addressing unforeseen consequences. [+1]
  7. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech responsibly by sharing concerns based on cited information, contributing to an informed public discourse. [+1]