Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83

The statement in question expresses frustration and disappointment with the development of a technology, specifically referring to its perceived lack of progress or intelligence. The tone is critical and somewhat dismissive, using terms like 'stupid' and 'embarrassing' to describe the technology.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not actively seek to harm, but the use of derogatory language could be seen as harmful to the discourse by discouraging open, respectful communication. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy of individuals but does not uphold the dignity of those involved in the development of the technology by using insulting language. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy. It dismisses efforts and progress without acknowledging the complexities involved in technological development. [-1]
  4. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The statement does not demonstrate an effort to correct mistakes or misunderstandings but rather perpetuates a negative view without constructive feedback. [-1]