Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83
5/15/2024, 5:56:05 PM
X
In reply to:
ClockworkRelativity
@Clockrelativity
·
611d
@GaryMarcus Bear with me professor Marcus, even if I sound a bit “e/acc”.

GPT4o is just GPT4 with a fancy voice upgrade. The model is still at 2022-23 est compute power.

Whenever the new GPT5 comes out, I think there will be a substantial SOTA improvement.

GPT4 still hallucinates
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
611d
Honestly astonished at how stupid 4o is.

Why ship this at all? When ChatGPT was dumb it was almost cute. By now, 18 months later, this is just embarrassing.
Marc-Oliver Gewaltig
@gewaltig
·
611d
@GaryMarcus

The statement by @Clockrelativity is a critical response to a discussion about the advancements and capabilities of AI models, specifically addressing the perceived lack of progress despite significant resources and talent. The tone is somewhat dismissive and sarcastic, suggesting that the entities involved are 'pwning themselves' by revealing their limitations.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm but uses a mocking tone which could be seen as slightly harmful in a professional or respectful discourse. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It respects the privacy and dignity of others as it does not target any individual personally but comments on the collective efforts of a group.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement lacks a compassionate or empathetic tone, leaning more towards criticism without constructive feedback. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    It engages in criticism but does not foster constructive dialogue or offer solutions, which diminishes its effectiveness in promoting understanding. [-1]
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The statement does not acknowledge any counterpoints or potential merits in the opposing view, which could be seen as a failure to correct or balance the critique. [-1]
  6. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The use of influence here is neutral; it neither significantly betters nor harms societal understanding of the issue.
  7. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement uses the platform to express an opinion responsibly but could improve in integrity by offering more balanced or constructive criticism.