Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83
5/15/2024, 5:58:23 PM
X
In reply to:
ClockworkRelativity
@Clockrelativity
·
611d
@GaryMarcus Perhaps both scenarios are correct?

Maybe?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
611d
@Clockrelativity IMHO they are inadvertently pwning themselves, accidentally revealing how little they have advanced despite immense resources and their pick of talent.
ClockworkRelativity
@Clockrelativity
·
611d
@GaryMarcus Bear with me professor Marcus, even if I sound a bit “e/acc”.

GPT4o is just GPT4 with a fancy voice upgrade. The model is still at 2022-23 est compute power.

Whenever the new GPT5 comes out, I think there will be a substantial SOTA improvement.

GPT4 still hallucinates
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
611d
Honestly astonished at how stupid 4o is.

Why ship this at all? When ChatGPT was dumb it was almost cute. By now, 18 months later, this is just embarrassing.
Marc-Oliver Gewaltig
@gewaltig
·
611d
@GaryMarcus

The statement in question is part of a broader conversation about the development and capabilities of AI models, specifically addressing the hardware and computational resources used in their training. The tone is inquisitive and constructive, aiming to clarify or add information regarding the technological advancements and corporate deals that might influence AI development.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to contribute constructively to the discussion about AI development, focusing on factual aspects like hardware updates and corporate deals, thus doing no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It respects the dignity of others by maintaining a professional and factual tone without any personal attacks or derogatory comments. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The comment promotes understanding by providing potentially new information about the resources involved in AI development, which could be educational for those following the conversation. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the assumptions about the hardware used for AI training, which could lead to a more informed discussion. [+1]
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The commenter acknowledges the possibility of new information (the Microsoft deal) that could affect the understanding of AI advancements, showing a willingness to correct or expand on previous statements. [+1]
  6. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    By focusing on factual information and contributing to a public discussion about AI, the statement uses its influence to better inform the public. [+1]
  7. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech responsibly, using the platform to share information and viewpoints relevant to the public interest in AI technology. [+1]