Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement discusses the progress and perceived limitations of AI technology, specifically referencing the performance improvements of different versions of GPT models on the MMLU benchmark. It suggests that AI development is not advancing as quickly as expected, implying a 'hitting a wall' in terms of progress.
- The statement does no harm as it is a factual critique of AI progress. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the dignity of others as it does not target or demean any individual or group. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement promotes understanding by sharing information about AI development trends and challenges, which can foster informed discussions. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence responsibly by contributing to a broader understanding of AI technology's current state and limitations. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.