Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83

The statement in question is part of a broader conversation about the development and improvement of artificial intelligence technologies, specifically discussing the balance between acquiring more data versus improving algorithms. This conversation addresses a significant public issue in the field of technology and AI development, making it a part of public discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm but rather stimulates thought and discussion on AI development methodologies. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, focusing solely on the topic of AI without targeting any individual or group. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by questioning current practices and suggesting alternative approaches, which could lead to more informed discussions on AI. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism of current AI development practices without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its influence to provoke thought and potentially guide AI development towards more effective practices, aiming for the betterment of the field. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech by responsibly using the platform to discuss important aspects of AI development. [+1]