Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83
5/17/2024, 7:13:53 AM
X
In reply to:
ΔI ₳ristotle
@AiAristotle
·
612d
@GaryMarcus The Bitter Lesson.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
612d
Why assume that the breakthrough we need now is even MORE data, rather than better algorithms?

If we can’t get AI to be solid with an entire internet’s worth of data, are we really doing AI right?
Alexandr Wang
@alexandr_wang
·
612d
9/ But we really need a step change here. Every major AI breakthrough over the past two decades has been driven by better and more data—dating back to the original deep neural network of AlexNet on ImageNet.

Scaling laws clearly illustrate where we're headed—we need more data!

The statement '@AiAristotle The bitter lesson has made no real progress on reasoning, planning, or robustness.' is part of a broader conversation on the role of data versus algorithms in AI development. It engages in a substantive discussion about AI methodologies, which is a significant topic in technology and society. Therefore, it constitutes public discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm but is somewhat negative in tone, which could be perceived as slightly harmful in a professional discourse. [-1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement lacks a constructive tone and does not promote understanding or empathy. It dismisses progress without suggesting alternatives or improvements. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in a critical dialogue but lacks constructiveness. It does not include personal attacks, but it could be more constructive in its criticism.