Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83

The statement and the conversation address the topic of artificial intelligence (AI) development and its practical implications, which is a matter of public interest and technological discourse. The statement reflects on the progression and current state of AI technology, suggesting a shift from initial excitement to a more critical, perhaps skeptical perspective in the following year. The conversation adds a personal experience with AI, highlighting limitations in current technology.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm as it merely provides an observation and prediction about AI development trends without targeting any individual or group. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by setting realistic expectations for AI technology, which can foster a more informed and balanced public perspective. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in a form of constructive criticism by tempering expectations after a year of hype. It does not attack any individual but rather comments on the general trend and public sentiment towards AI. [+1]