Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83
5/17/2024, 11:02:17 AM
X
In reply to:
Michael Mindrum ☸️
@MichaelMindrum
·
612d
@GaryMarcus @generic_void It’s still not a conflict of interest… just may not be the wisest course of action.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
612d
@generic_void It positions him to take a particular energy-demanding rather than data efficient answer on questions like these
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
612d
Why assume that the breakthrough we need now is even MORE data, rather than better algorithms?

If we can’t get AI to be solid with an entire internet’s worth of data, are we really doing AI right?
SMA 🏴‍☠️
@generic_void
·
612d
@GaryMarcus I don’t think that’s a conflict of interest, rather solving an externality caused by his other work. I wish more companies did this tbh
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
612d
Why isn’t the media talking more about Sam Altman’s billion dollar fission company and potential conflicts of interest, especially as he seeks to build ever-larger and more energy-consuming AI models? https://oklo.com/newsroom/news-d…

The statement in question is part of a Twitter conversation that addresses the potential conflict of interest involving Sam Altman, who is associated with both a nonprofit (OpenAI) and a for-profit energy company. The discussion revolves around the ethical implications and potential conflicts arising from the intersection of Altman's roles in these organizations, especially given the energy demands of AI technologies developed by OpenAI. This conversation is a substantive engagement with public issues, specifically the ethics of leadership roles in technology and energy sectors, and thus constitutes public discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to highlight a potential ethical issue without causing harm, focusing on the conflict of interest rather than personal attacks. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of the individuals involved by focusing on the roles and actions rather than personal attributes. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by bringing attention to a potential ethical issue, encouraging readers to consider the implications of such conflicts. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the wisdom of the current arrangement without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its influence to better society by fostering a discussion on ethical practices in leadership and technology. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech by responsibly using the platform to discuss relevant and significant ethical concerns in the tech industry. [+1]