Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83

The statement and linked content involve a discussion about AI risks with Jane Goodall, a notable figure in the scientific community. The content appears to be a reflection on a conversation about an important and relevant topic in technology and ethics, which qualifies as public discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm as it promotes a discussion on AI risks, a significant topic for public safety and ethical considerations. [+2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of Jane Goodall, presenting her in a positive light and focusing on her professional insights. [+2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The content promotes understanding and compassion by highlighting concerns about AI, which could encourage more thoughtful discourse on technology's impact on society. [+2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The dialogue about AI risks is constructive and engages with a disagreement or concern in a respectful and informative manner. [+2]
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The statement acknowledges the significance of the conversation with Jane Goodall, suggesting a recognition of the importance of expert opinions in discussions about AI. [+1]
  6. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The use of the platform to discuss AI risks with a respected figure like Jane Goodall demonstrates a responsible use of influence to better societal understanding of complex issues. [+2]
  7. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech by sharing opinions and information on AI risks, contributing to the broader public discourse on technology and ethics. [+2]