In reply to:
Ori Nagel ⏸️
@ygrowthco
·
614d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
614d
Ori Nagel ⏸️
@ygrowthco
·
614d
The statement is part of a public discourse on the reliability and effectiveness of new AI technologies, specifically voice LLMs (Large Language Models). The conversation involves skepticism about the performance of these technologies based on past experiences with AI and robotics demos that did not meet expectations. The tone is cautious and critical, aiming to temper expectations based on empirical testing rather than demonstrations alone.
- The statement adheres to the principle of doing no harm with words and actions, as it responsibly raises concerns based on past experiences without spreading misinformation or causing unnecessary alarm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by encouraging a realistic approach to new technologies, urging that claims be thoroughly tested, which fosters a more informed and cautious optimism among the public. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the reliability of the demos in a factual and non-confrontational manner, contributing to a dialogue that seeks to verify claims rather than blindly accepting them. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its influence to advocate for a cautious and evidence-based approach to new technologies, which can lead to better societal outcomes by preventing disappointment and potential misuse of untested technologies. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.