Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement addresses a specific issue related to employment practices at OpenAI, particularly focusing on the conditions tied to stock compensation and non-disparagement clauses. This issue is framed within the context of broader discussions about corporate governance and employee rights, making it a part of public discourse.
- The statement aims to highlight perceived unfair practices without causing harm but uses strong language ('sketchy', 'sleazy') which could be seen as slightly harmful in tone. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not targeting any individual directly, but discusses the company's policy in general terms. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The use of strong language might detract slightly from promoting understanding and empathy, although it does aim to raise awareness about a potential issue.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of a policy, which is constructive in intent; however, the language used ('sketchy', 'sleazy') borders on personal attack against the company's practices, which could undermine constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its influence to highlight and possibly correct what the speaker sees as an unethical practice, aiming for the betterment of societal standards in corporate governance. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.