Gary Marcus

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 83
5/18/2024, 10:59:07 AM
X
In reply to:
AI Research Tools
@airesearchtools
·
614d
@GaryMarcus Gary, please, I would need clarification: if AGI is not possible with current methods and OpenAI is using those methods, what is the need for a super-alignment team?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
614d
Exactly what I have been warning about. This is no joke.
Sharon Goldman
@sharongoldman
·
614d
BREAKING: @OpenAI alignment lead @janleike says the company prioritized 'shiny products' over AI safety - and resigned just 2 days after @ilyasut's departure.
https://fortune.com/2024/05/17/o…

The statement '@airesearchtools We need to be prepared before AGi not after, and even dumb AI can cause problems if misused.' is a part of a broader conversation on Twitter concerning the ethical implications and safety concerns surrounding artificial intelligence (AI) development. This conversation is initiated in response to a news article about a significant resignation from OpenAI, citing safety concerns. The statement directly addresses the issue of AI safety, a significant public concern, especially in the context of rapid technological advancements in AI. Therefore, it constitutes public discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement promotes caution and preparedness in AI development, aiming to prevent harm caused by AI, aligning well with the principle of doing no harm with words and actions. [+2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the dignity of others and does not engage in harassment or hate speech, upholding the principle of respecting the privacy and dignity of others. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    By advocating for preparedness in AI development, the statement promotes understanding and awareness about the potential risks of AI, aligning with the principle of using words to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion. [+2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in a constructive manner by highlighting a significant issue without resorting to personal attacks, aligning with the principle of engaging in constructive criticism and dialogue. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its influence to highlight an important societal issue, aiming for the betterment of society by promoting safety and ethical considerations in AI development, aligning with the principle of using influence for societal betterment. [+2]