Gary Marcus

The statement engages in a discussion about the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) and whether it is necessary to provide alternatives when critiquing their limitations. This topic touches on public concerns about artificial intelligence and its applications, making it a part of public discourse.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is a reasoned argument about the expectations placed on critiques of LLMs. [+1]
2. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement promotes understanding by questioning the necessity of providing alternatives when critiquing a technology. It encourages critical thinking and dialogue about the expectations of technological critiques. [+1]
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning a specific argument about LLMs without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]