Gary Marcus

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 83

The statement criticizes accelerationists for their perceived indifference to the negative externalities of AI, suggesting that they do not care about the broader societal impacts. The tone is critical and accusatory, aiming to highlight the ethical concerns surrounding AI development and its effects on various aspects of life.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to highlight potential harm caused by accelerationists' indifference to AI's negative externalities, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm. However, the accusatory tone may not foster constructive dialogue. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy of individuals but could be seen as a form of cyberbullying or harassment towards accelerationists by generalizing their intentions negatively. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding and empathy for those affected by AI's negative externalities but does so by vilifying a specific group, which may not foster compassion.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism but does so in a manner that could be perceived as a personal attack on accelerationists, rather than fostering constructive dialogue. [-1]