Gary Marcus

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 83

The statement and the conversation it refers to constitute public discourse as they engage with the issue of whistleblower protections in the context of AI development and corporate practices. The statement supports the need for strong whistleblower protections, which is a significant public issue, especially as AI technology becomes more influential.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement strives to do no harm and instead promotes a protective measure for individuals who might expose unethical practices, aligning well with this principle. [+2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by advocating for protections that would prevent retaliation against whistleblowers, thus upholding this principle. [+2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    By supporting whistleblower protections, the statement promotes understanding, empathy, and compassion for those who might be in a vulnerable position, aligning well with this principle. [+2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by agreeing with a call for stronger protections and does not engage in personal attacks, thus adhering to this principle. [+2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses the platform to advocate for societal betterment by supporting measures that could lead to more ethical practices in AI development, aligning well with this principle. [+2]