Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of AI investment and the credibility of different voices in the AI field. It critiques the hype surrounding AI-related stocks and calls for more responsible listening to researchers and leaders in the field.
- The statement aims to do no harm by advocating for responsible investment and listening to credible voices, but it uses the term 'grifting cheerleaders' which could be seen as harmful.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the term 'grifting cheerleaders' could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by encouraging investors to listen to credible researchers and responsible leaders. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the hype around AI investments but uses a personal attack ('grifting cheerleaders') against Sam Altman. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its influence to advocate for responsible investment and listening to credible voices, which is for the betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to responsibly critique the hype around AI investments, but the use of 'grifting cheerleaders' could be seen as lacking integrity.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.