Gary Marcus

The statement by @GaryMarcus in response to @LemUhuru constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue concerning the credibility and future of OpenAI, a significant entity in the AI industry. The tone is defensive but aims to clarify the nature of the poll and its implications.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is a clarification rather than an attack. [+1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does attempt to clarify a point which can be seen as a step towards understanding.
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing the criticism directly without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
5. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by engaging in a public issue with integrity. [+1]