Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
618d
The statement 'Interview is worth seeing. LLMs are not the way to go.' engages in public discourse by addressing the topic of artificial intelligence, specifically the future and effectiveness of large language models (LLMs). The statement is a response to a conversation about AI's progress and potential, referencing an interview with Gary Marcus, a known figure in the AI field. The tone is critical and suggests skepticism about the current trajectory of AI development, particularly LLMs.
- The statement does not cause harm and is a part of a broader discussion on AI, which is a significant public issue. It is a critical opinion but does not engage in harmful rhetoric. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by encouraging viewers to watch the interview and form their own opinions. It contributes to the discourse on AI with a critical perspective, which can foster a more nuanced understanding of the topic. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of LLMs without resorting to personal attacks. It focuses on the technology rather than individuals or organizations. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By participating in the discussion on AI, the statement uses its influence to contribute to an important societal debate, potentially guiding public opinion and policy on AI development. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.