In reply to:
Greg Coppola
@gregcoppola5d
·
619d
The statement by @gregcoppola5d and the reply by @GaryMarcus both constitute public discourse as they engage in a debate about the behavior and language used in a public discussion involving prominent figures in the field of machine learning. The conversation touches on issues of respect, civility, and the appropriateness of language in public debates.
- The statement by @GaryMarcus does not strive to do no harm, as it includes aggressive language and personal attacks. This violates the principle of doing no harm with words and actions. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement by @GaryMarcus does not respect the privacy and dignity of others, as it includes name-calling and a challenge to a physical confrontation. This violates the principle of respecting the privacy and dignity of others. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement by @GaryMarcus does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it escalates the conflict and uses derogatory language. This violates the principle of promoting understanding, empathy, and compassion. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement by @GaryMarcus does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. Instead, it resorts to personal attacks and ad hominem arguments. This violates the principle of engaging in constructive criticism and dialogue. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.