In reply to:
Greg Coppola
@gregcoppola5d
·
619d
The statement and the preceding conversation involve a discussion about respect and the use of language in public discourse. The initial comment by @GaryMarcus uses provocative language to challenge @geoffreyhinton, which is then criticized by @gregcoppola5d for being disrespectful. The reply by @gregcoppola5d questions the consistency of @gregcoppola5d's stance on respect, pointing out a perceived threat of violence from @geoffreyhinton. The conversation touches on issues of respect, constructive criticism, and the use of language in public debates.
- The statement by @GaryMarcus does not strive to do no harm, as it uses provocative and aggressive language, which can escalate tensions. This violates the principle of striving to do no harm (-2 points). [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement by @GaryMarcus does not respect the privacy and dignity of others, as it publicly insults @geoffreyhinton. This violates the principle of respecting privacy and dignity (-2 points). [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement by @GaryMarcus does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it uses derogatory language and challenges @geoffreyhinton in a confrontational manner. This violates the principle of promoting understanding, empathy, and compassion (-2 points). [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement by @GaryMarcus does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it resorts to personal attacks and ad hominem arguments. This violates the principle of engaging in constructive criticism and dialogue (-2 points). [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.