Gary Marcus

Rank 11 of 47
|
Score 83
5/21/2024, 5:58:51 AM
X
In reply to:
Olivia P. Walker
@olivia_p_walker
·
619d
@GaryMarcus Take 2: fair. mission creep is a thing. well, for nonprofits. is open AI a nonprofit still (I know some changes were made if I remember correctly)?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
619d
@olivia_p_walker What should happen next:
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
619d
The Board needs to clean house and return to the mission.
Olivia P. Walker
@olivia_p_walker
·
619d
@GaryMarcus so considering how you feel, what do you want to see happen next? Or what does all of this tell you needs to be done? How would you like all of this to end?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
619d
Speaking of lack of candor:
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
619d
Unbelievable. From Ms Publicly Available Sources.

I have 100% lost faith in the entire company.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
620d
The OpenAI board was right. Even on little things, Sam is not consistently candid.

Earlier today OpenAI said the resemblance to ScarJo was a “coincidence”.

It was not:

The statement 'Yes it is still a nonprofit, now with for profit subsidiaries' addresses a public concern about the organizational structure and mission of OpenAI. It provides a factual clarification in response to a query about the nonprofit status of OpenAI, which is relevant to the ongoing discussion about the company's mission and transparency.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement strives to do no harm by providing a factual clarification, which helps in reducing misinformation. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by focusing on the organizational structure rather than individuals. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by clarifying the nonprofit status of OpenAI, which is essential for informed public discourse. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by directly addressing the question posed, without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses the platform to provide accurate information, contributing to the betterment of public understanding. [+1]