Gary Marcus

Rank 11 of 47
|
Score 83
5/21/2024, 6:00:13 AM
X
In reply to:
Dave Troy
@davetroy
·
620d
@gilduran76 @GaryMarcus Yeah. Gary may not be aware that you worked with @GeorgeLakoff , and the more I think on it you guys may have done the work closest to what Gary's looking for here.
gil duran
@gilduran76
·
620d
@davetroy @GaryMarcus We did this one in 2017. I think these categories cover most of it.
Dave Troy
@davetroy
·
620d
@GaryMarcus This popped up in my feed next to your tweet. Kismet?
gil duran
@gilduran76
·
620d
Trump's use of Nazi "reich" terminology to frame his campaign isn't an accident -- it's a Trial Balloon.
As usual, he's floating offensive and outrageous idea to push extreme ideas and test public reaction.
More at FrameLab with @GeorgeLakoff : 🎈https://www.theframelab.org/unif…
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
620d
Need a taxonomy of lies, to cover
• bald-faced lies
• errors of omission
• feigned ignorance
• paltering
• misdirection
• etc

Anything already out there?

The statement in question is a reply within a broader conversation about the taxonomy of lies and the use of specific terminology in political discourse. The statement asks for a correlation between a taxonomy and traits of malignant narcissism, which implies a critical analysis of certain behaviors and their psychological underpinnings. This conversation touches on public issues, particularly political communication and the behavior of public figures, thus constituting public discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but implies a critical analysis of behaviors that could be seen as harmful. It maintains a neutral tone and does not engage in harmful rhetoric. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by focusing on behaviors and traits rather than personal attacks. However, it indirectly references a public figure in a critical context, which could be seen as a violation of this principle. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by encouraging a deeper analysis of behaviors and their psychological traits. It aims to foster a more nuanced discussion about political communication. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by asking for a correlation between a taxonomy and psychological traits. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to encourage a deeper understanding of political communication and psychological traits, which can contribute to the betterment of society. [+1]