The statement appears to be a response to a previous tweet that was deleted. It mentions Google and murder in a context that is described as a joke. The tone seems defensive, and the intent is to clarify that the original tweet was not serious.
- The statement acknowledges that the original tweet was a joke, which suggests an attempt to mitigate any harm caused. However, the mention of 'murder' could be seen as potentially harmful, even in jest.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- By deleting the original tweet, the speaker shows some respect for the privacy and dignity of others, possibly recognizing that the joke could be misinterpreted or offensive. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on clarifying the intent behind the original tweet.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It is a defensive clarification rather than an attack or ad hominem argument. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement acknowledges the principles of free speech by clarifying that the original tweet was a joke, but it also shows responsibility by deleting the potentially harmful tweet. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.