In reply to:
JaniV
@JaniVehkalahti
·
623d
Kate Crawford
@katecrawford
·
623d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue related to the ethical use of voice in AI technology, referencing a legal case to provide context.
- The statement does not cause harm directly but brings attention to a legal precedent, which can be seen as a neutral action.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- By referencing a legal case, the statement aims to promote understanding of the legal implications of using someone's voice without permission. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments; it provides a factual reference to support the discussion. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by contributing to a meaningful dialogue on the ethical use of AI. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.