Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 84
5/23/2024, 12:48:25 PM
X
In reply to:
Bunagaya
@Bunagayafrost
·
625d
@GaryMarcus
Bunagaya
@Bunagayafrost
·
627d
"Sky and all the others were hired a long time before sama reached out to scarjo"
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
626d
Startlingly bad take, both legally and ethically.

This guy with a couple million views has literally no idea what the law is and completely ignored the issues of consent (she said no) and intent.

The consent and intent issues are so obvious I won’t say more, but the legal…
Joseph Carlson
@joecarlsonshow
·
627d
I’m sorry. I’m 100% with OpenAI on this one.

Scarlett Johansson owns her own voice. But she has zero claim on voices that sound “similar”. She turned down the role. She doesn’t get to police them going to a second choice that sounds similar.

Imagine being the woman that voice…

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing legal and ethical issues related to voice imitation and consent. It references legal cases to support its argument, contributing to a broader discussion on intellectual property and personal rights.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement strives to do no harm by providing factual information and legal precedents to support its argument, promoting a more informed discussion. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by focusing on legal cases and public figures without engaging in personal attacks or harassment. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by providing references to legal cases, encouraging others to educate themselves on the issue. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing the legal and ethical aspects of the argument without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]