In reply to:
Larry Hunter
@ProfLHunter
·
626d
The statement by the user is a response in a conversation about the ethical implications of AI-generated virtual humans. It references a draft received before a Senate testimony, indicating engagement with a public issue related to AI and its societal impacts.
- The statement does not cause harm and is neutral in tone, focusing on sharing information. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does contribute to a broader discussion on ethical issues.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement is constructive and does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By participating in a discussion about AI ethics, the statement uses influence for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles and uses the platform responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.