Gary Marcus

The statement by @Bunagayafrost engages in a discussion about the legal and ethical implications of voice imitation, referencing a historical legal case involving Tom Waits. This discussion touches on public issues related to intellectual property, consent, and the ethics of using similar-sounding voices in commercial contexts.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not appear to cause harm directly. It references a legal case to support an argument, which is a constructive way to engage in debate. [+1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by focusing on the legal and ethical aspects rather than personal attacks. [+1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   By referencing a legal precedent, the statement promotes understanding of the issue, although it could be more empathetic towards differing viewpoints. [+1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in constructive dialogue by providing a counterpoint to the previous argument, without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]
5. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses its platform to discuss a significant societal issue, contributing to the broader conversation about intellectual property and consent in the digital age. [+1]