Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 84
5/23/2024, 2:36:25 PM
X
In reply to:
david king
@HomeMediaX
·
626d
@GaryMarcus @DavidSacks @Jason Whelp, they let Altman talk a bunch and say nothing for 45 minutes, would be fun to hear there or on @bgurley pod, as they're all in on LLMs

And I'm not seeing it
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
626d
@HomeMediaX @DavidSacks existing law covers many things but not all, and in some cases is ambiguous. All in really ought have me on if they want some lively debate… cc @Jason
david king
@HomeMediaX
·
626d
@GaryMarcus @DavidSacks been saying this for a while: we've got plenty of case law. Just need to apply it to AI regarding NIL, copyrighted works, etc
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
626d
Good luck, OpenAI. Quote of the day:

The statement is part of a broader conversation about legal issues related to AI, specifically regarding the application of existing laws to AI technologies. The conversation involves multiple participants discussing the implications of case law on AI, and the statement in question expresses a willingness to engage in further discussion on a podcast.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm and is neutral in tone, simply expressing a willingness to participate in a discussion. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding and empathy by showing an interest in engaging in a dialogue about the topic. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by expressing a desire to participate in a discussion, which can lead to a better understanding of the issues at hand. [+1]