In reply to:
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive discussion about legal precedents related to voice impersonation, which is a public issue. The statement corrects a factual error in a previous conversation about a legal case involving Tom Waits and Frito-Lay, providing a link to a relevant news article for verification.
- The statement does no harm with words and actions as it simply corrects a factual error without any negative language or implications. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by providing accurate information and a source for verification, which can help others better understand the legal context of voice impersonation cases. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by correcting a factual error without attacking the original poster or making any personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement acknowledges and corrects a mistake, which is a positive action in public discourse. [+1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by providing accurate information and a credible source. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.