Marianne Williamson

Rank 27 of 47
|
Score -6
5/23/2024, 4:02:35 PM
X
In reply to:
ℂ𝕙𝕣𝕚𝕤𝕥𝕚𝕒𝕟 𝕊𝕥𝕣𝕒𝕟
@khris_thomas
·
538d
@thefurlinator Your actions toward me demonstrate the behavior of an angry/abusive person yourself. I saw exactly how Marianne conducts herself behind the scenes, even when she was disappointed with people. Sorry this character-assassination you’re attempting won’t work on me. I know better.
alex furlin
@thefurlinator
·
538d
@khris_thomas A *lot* of people have spoken about Marianne’s unprofessionalism, anger, and abuse.
ℂ𝕙𝕣𝕚𝕤𝕥𝕚𝕒𝕟 𝕊𝕥𝕣𝕒𝕟
@khris_thomas
·
538d
@thefurlinator Hmm. Aren’t you the one who went around saying Marianne was mean to you? Sounds like you’re a bit of a jerk yourself. Anyway, Biden will lose to Trump. Brace for impact.
alex furlin
@thefurlinator
·
538d
@khris_thomas Give it the fuck up man
ℂ𝕙𝕣𝕚𝕤𝕥𝕚𝕒𝕟 𝕊𝕥𝕣𝕒𝕟
@khris_thomas
·
538d
I’m amazed to see 7.4% of Oregon primary voters chose Marianne Williamson! #ceasefire #Marianne2024 ❤️🤍💙

The statement and the preceding conversation involve a public discussion about the behavior and professionalism of a public figure, Marianne Williamson, in the context of a political campaign. The tone of the conversation is defensive and accusatory, with participants defending or criticizing Marianne Williamson's behavior. The statement attempts to refute allegations of unprofessionalism and abuse, while also attributing damage to the campaign to a 'doppelgänger.'

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement attempts to defend against accusations without resorting to personal attacks, which aligns with the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. However, the overall conversation includes accusatory and defensive language, which can be harmful.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in cyberbullying or hate speech. However, the term 'kooky, crazy, horrible person' could be seen as disrespectful and damaging to someone's dignity. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is primarily defensive and does not seek to foster a constructive dialogue. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in a form of constructive criticism by addressing the accusations directly. However, the overall tone of the conversation, including the preceding messages, involves personal attacks and ad hominem arguments, which violate this principle. [-1]